Water and Sanitation Report Card: Slow Progress, Inadequate Funding

pouring-water-640-629x419

The Ebola crisis has thrown into sharp relief the issue of water, sanitation and hygiene in treating and caring for the sick. Dying patients are being taken to hospitals which never had enough water to maintain hygiene, and the epidemic has pushed the system to the breaking point.

Last week’s World Health Organisation report produced by UN Water, the Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking Water (GLAAS), has provided a sobering picture of water and sanitation services so necessary to healthcare systems around the world.

The annual analysis is a gold mine of data, covering 94 countries and using information from 23 aid agencies. The story it tells this year is of modest progress alongside inadequate funding, poor monitoring and a desperate need for skilled regulators, administrators and engineers to keep services running effectively.

Among GLAAS’s most important findings are how poorly finances intended to address the water and sanitation crisis are targeted.

Urban areas are prioritised over rural regardless of the level of need – nearly three-quarters of aid spending goes to urban areas and more than 60 percent of aid is in the form of loans, which are rarely targeted to the poor. This suggests rural people and the urban poor are being further marginalised.

Nearly three-quarters of the aid targeted at water, sanitation and hygiene programmes is spend on drinking water supplies. Despite these investments in improved supplies, 1.8 billion people drink water contaminated with fecal matter.

It’s fair to assume that this is linked to the 2.5 billion people still without a basic toilet. Too much money is being invested in finding or making clean water, and not enough in containing the waste that contaminates it.

Addressing these issues effectively requires money, training and monitoring, but these, too, are falling short.

The GLAAS report has found that financing for water and sanitation in 70 percent of responding countries covers less than 80 percent of the costs of operation and maintenance for existing services.

Regulators, administrators and engineers are all in short supply in developing countries. All are of critical importance in the safe, sustainable delivery of water and basic sanitation services, fundamental to good public health and economic growth. Yet it’s rare to see plans or investment to address this. Only one third of countries even have a human resources strategy in place.

Monitoring is also seriously lacking. WaterAid is examining the sanitation transformations that took place in East Asia, and has found that responsive monitoring which actually leads to changes in policy and investment is a crucial driver of sanitation improvements. But very few countries have enough personnel to collect or review data, or enough senior political interest to demand it.

Less than half of countries have a formal rural service provider that reports to a regulatory authority, and effectively monitors its services.

What does this mean? It means that half of the lucky minority of rural poor who have gained access to improved water and sanitation are still using unregulated services which have no way to guarantee safety.

But there is progress. Proposals for the U.N.’s new Sustainable Development Goals, now under negotiation, include goals for water and sanitation services that include schools and healthcare facilities along with households.

This is of huge importance, particularly when we look at the Ebola crisis in West Africa – where healthcare systems in Liberia and Sierra Leone in particular were broken in years of conflict and never properly rebuilt – or this year’s cholera outbreak in Ghana, where 20,900 people were infected and 166 died of preventable infection transmitted by water contaminated with human waste.

The GLAAS reports that less than one-third of countries have a plan for drinking water or sanitation in health care facilities and schools that is implemented, funded and reviewed regularly. These targets are long overdue.

The state of water and sanitation is a global health crisis. Some 10 million children have died since 2000 of diarrhoeal illnesses, directly linked to growing up without clean water, basic toilets and hygiene. It is possible to reach everyone, everywhere with water, sanitation and hygiene education, but it will require strong political will, a comprehensive and accelerated approach, and financing.

As the U.N. negotiates the new Sustainable Development Goals, including a strong, dedicated goal on water and sanitation that incorporates water and sanitation targets into goals on healthcare will address many of these shortfalls.

What the present shortlist does not include, but which the GLAAS report has clearly shown, is the need to find and train people to drive this transformation, and keep services running sustainably.

This article was originally published on Inter Press Service News Agency on November 24, 2014. Analysis by Tim Brewer.

Share

About the New WASHwatch: Linking the WASH Community and Mobilizing for Improved Monitoring and Accountability

WASHwatch.org has recently re-launched! While we have indeed received a beautiful face lift, we have also increased our capacity to serve the WASH community. We are eager to start working with you!

WASHwatch intends to serve as an online collaborative platform for monitoring government and donor commitments to WASH, striving to increase sector transparency, encourage sector dialogue and knowledge sharing, and ultimately strengthen sector monitoring and accountability.

You may already be familiar with our capacity to support sector transparency. Indeed, on the recently launched website, you can already find the human right to water and sanitation, Africa’s eThekwini, and South Asia’s SACOSAN declarations. WASHwatch has the ability to monitor an infinite number of declarations. In the coming months we will add relevant Millennium Development Goals, commitments made at Sanitation and Water for All High Level Meetings, and any other commitments you might want to bring to our attention.

While having easy access to all relevant WASH promises is convenient, it is not enough for sector transparency. To be a truly transparent sector we need to be able to monitor and report on commitments. WASHwatch monitors progress against commitments using traffic lights (red = little or no progress against the commitment, amber = some, and green = good progress). Scores can easily be compared across countries, and comparative reports can be generated for use in your planning and advocacy. For those with an interest in data, all indicators are presented, and data sets used to report scores are available.

Going beyond monitoring commitment progress, YOU, the users of WASHwatch, dedicated WASH professionals and advocates, can provide valuable comment and/or evidence to absolutely any commitment score on WASHwatch.

WASHwatch intends to encourage sector dialogue and knowledge sharing by providing an opportunity to collaboratively respond to sector monitoring. If you agree or disagree with a score, tell us why. If you have evidence to support or counter a score, share it with us. We will publish all of your contributions with you as the author (unless you wish to remain anonymous).

It is WASHwatch’s intent that comments and evidence you contribute influence formal monitoring processes, limiting biased reporting, and generating more representative scoring. You after all, have insider knowledge as to what’s really happening in the sector, and should thus be consulted in scoring commitment progress. WASHwatch intends to make sure you are!

In addition to providing you with an opportunity to contribute comment and evidence to scores, WASHwatch hopes to host dialogue and debate around current monitoring mechanisms. If you think the commitments and/or indicators of a current declaration are weak, tell us by identifying the weakness and making suggestions for improvement. By engaging in such conversations on WASHwatch, together we can propose and influence future decisions around methods for sector monitoring.

Ultimately, contributing comment and evidence to WASHwatch provides you with an opportunity to have your voice heard and joined with WASH advocates around the world. There is strength in numbers after all. WASHwatch intends to mobilize the WASH community to collectively improve sector monitoring and accountability.

Join the WASHwatch community now! Explore the new washwatch.org website, walk through our User Guide  as a tutorial, use WASHwatch to support your work, and starting sharing your knowledge now! Do not hesitate to contact us at info@washwatch.org  for more information or support.

Are you on Twitter of Facebook? Follow us @WASHwatch and like our Facebook page!

Share