WASHwatch.org is not the last word – it is always a work in progress.

Our goal at WASHwatch is to provide a complete picture of national water and sanitation policies through measuring progress made by government towards meeting their policy and budgetary commitments. Were this simple, it would already have been done. Unfortunately, the necessary data is not always easily accessible, if at all. So how do you analyse data that is not available? You have to generate it!

The data available at WASHwatch can be thought of as an ongoing survey of how WASH stakeholders and advocates view their government’s progress. One common worry we have encountered is that as the data is crowdsourced (and therefore has not been independently checked for its validity), it might not be accurate. We do not see this as a challenge but rather an opportunity. Often when people think of data they think of hard data, that is, quantifiable data put forth as indisputable fact.  Hard data is certainly valuable but there is also a role to be played by hard data’s softer counterpart. Soft data is more subjective, a collection of anecdotes, surveys and opinions. Both hard and soft data add value and the two often work together, complementing each other to tell the full story.

The data available at WASHwatch is subjective and as with any survey data, the value is all in the analysis. It is not because survey respondents all agree about something that it is necessarily true but their agreement (or disagreement) tells a story. “Good progress” will undoubtedly mean different things to different people. Not all of the contributors will have access to the same information. Some contributors might have a rural perspective and others a more urban perspective. However, it is precisely this array of perspectives that enriches the WASHwatch data. Consensus over a country’s high score indicates more than just progress, it indicates a certain level of transparency because multiple stakeholders are aware of what the government is doing. Similarly, a government scoring poorly does not necessarily mean that no progress has been made but that the government in question has not been very transparent about their successes (or their failures). Although not always explicitly stated, it is certainly in the spirit of the Sharm el-Sheikh, eThekwini, SACOSAN for governments to improve transparency surrounding water and sanitation programming, policy and funding. After all, what good is a national sanitation policy if no one is aware it exists and no one can monitor whether or not it is being implemented?

WASHwatch contributors are encouraged to comment on previously uploaded data. Like any good survey, one response simply won’t do and the more the merrier! In order to generate reliable data, we need responses from multiple sources. WASHwatch data is constantly changing, reflecting changes in government actions and policies.  When governments make progress or start to fall behind, WASHwatch provides a platform for people to report these changes in real-time. Like policy, policy monitoring is an active and dynamic process.  WASHwatch provides a platform to collect and share data about  water and sanitation policy commitments. However, WASHwatch is not the last word. It, like the government policies we monitor, is a work in progress.

Join the discussion at WASHwatch


Katelyn Rogers


3 thoughts on “WASHwatch.org is not the last word – it is always a work in progress.

  1. Olivier Germain

    Good blog.Hope it triggers more inputs.
    Would it be possible to have a button on the WASH Watch page that enabled you to download a neat pdf country report that summarises and presents the key information contained on WASH Watch for one country (i.e. a one page document/report that could be printed out by CSOs to use as an advocacy document during meetings with counterparts, government officials, donors, journalists etc…?

    • washwatchblogger

      Thanks Olivier,

      At the moment the PDF option isn’t programmed in, but that’s certainly something we should think about for the next site update.

      In the meantime the page is designed to format in a usable way if you simply print direct from the browser, for exactly the purpose you mention. I think we should make that clearer on the site, as perhaps many users don’t realise this is an option…


      • Olivier Germain

        Thanks Tim,
        Just tried the print preview for a country and actually it does come out quite nicely as a 4 page print out of the tables and graphs. Thanks for the tip and yes maybe make this more visible on the site so more users are aware of this.


Leave a Reply